Fuse Manufacturing
Consultant Documents · 02 of 05 · Overview

What Fuse runs, and how far it can be taken

The working set in the first implementation, the capability behind it, and an honest account of what each addition costs to turn on.

The line

One rule sits above everything else

Intacct is the golden source and always does the accounting. There is no option, no setting, and no client configuration that changes it.

Everything on this page adds operational capability. Not one item on it touches the books. Fuse records what happened on the floor and posts the consequence to Intacct; Intacct decides what that is worth and where it lands. Where Intacct holds a value, Fuse reads it. Where Intacct holds no value, Fuse refuses and reports rather than inventing one.

That is why the list below can be as long as it is without alarming a finance director. Adding maintenance scheduling or operator time capture to a manufacturer changes nothing about who owns the ledger.


Running today

Two front doors, one posting path

Every movement, however it is entered, builds the same document and goes through the same posting code. There is no second implementation to keep in step.

Works Orders

Production against a bill of materials. Components off, finished goods on, at the cost Intacct holds.

Backflush decrease + run increase, one atomic post

Issue to WIP

Components out of stores into a work-in-progress warehouse, so consumption is visible before the job closes.

Inventory transfer

Item Transfer

Warehouse to warehouse, carrying bin, lot and serial detail where the client uses them.

Inventory transfer

Stock Control

Balance, ledger, projected quantity and stock on order, off the same numbers Intacct holds.

Read-only reporting

Alongside these, a shop-floor screen carries the same three movement flows in a form a supervisor can use on a tablet at the machine: a scan, a quantity, one button. It builds an ordinary stock document and submits it, so a rejection from Intacct rolls the movement back and the operator reads Intacct's own words on the screen in front of them.


The magnitude

What else a manufacturer can be given

Leader Rubber's implementation deliberately took a narrow slice. That was their operating choice, not a limit of the platform. Below is what sits behind it, grouped by what turning it on actually costs — which is the number a consultant needs in order to scope a deal rather than promise one.

Tier one · configuration

Nothing financial happens, so no new posting is needed

These are ERPNext capabilities that describe, schedule and control work. They move no stock and post nothing, so they are setup on an existing Fuse site — days, not a development project.

Routings and work centresOperations in sequence, each on a named machine or cell, with setup and run times.
Job cards and operation captureStart, pause and finish an operation at the machine. Who ran it, on what, for how long.
Capacity and schedulingFinite capacity per work centre, forward and backward scheduling, a shop-floor load view.
Quality inspectionInspection templates with parameters and tolerances, applied on production or before dispatch.
Non-conformance and reworkRecord a failure against a batch, hold it, route it to rework, and keep the reason on the record.
Asset maintenancePreventive schedules and breakdown logging against the machines that make the product.
TraceabilityLot and serial identity carried through consumption and production, so a batch can be traced both ways.
Demand and production planningMaterial requirements from forecast and open demand, producing suggested works orders.
Shop-floor documentsJob packets, pick sheets, route cards and labels printed from the works order.
Roles and approvalsWho may confirm a run, who may transfer, what needs a second signature — enforced, not trusted.
Tier two · existing posting, new use

Moves stock, but down a path Fuse already posts

These change how work is modelled rather than how it reaches Intacct. The posting is written and proven; what changes is the shape of the movement flowing into it.

Multi-level sub-assembliesA bill of materials several levels deep, with each level made, stocked and consumed in turn.
Alternative bills of materialsMore than one valid recipe for the same product; the posting follows what was actually consumed.
Component substitutionApproved alternates per pairing, so the floor can swap a material without inventing one.
Staged WIP by operationA work-in-progress location per stage rather than one, so value in progress is visible by step.
Bin-level movementRack and location detail on every transfer, for clients whose Intacct company tracks bins.
Barcode-driven flowsThe shop-floor screens already resolve a scan; this is labels and printing, not integration work.
Tier three · new posting to build

A real development, quoted as one

Each of these needs its matching Intacct posting written and proven against a live company before it ships. They are switched off today rather than half-built — a movement Intacct never sees is the one failure the product exists to prevent.

Goods receiptingReceive against a purchase order on the dock, updating quantity and cost in Intacct.
Cycle countingRun the count itself in Fuse on a tablet, against Intacct's own count definitions.
Subcontract issue and receiptMaterial out to a third party and finished work back, with the value tracked while it is away.
Pick, pack and dispatchRelieve stock on shipment, ahead of the invoice Intacct raises.
Co-products and scrapA run that yields more than one valuable output. Refused today rather than guessed at.
Master data authored in FuseItems, warehouses and BOMs created here and pushed to Intacct, instead of mirrored from it.

Nothing in tier three is promised as present. It is named so a consultant can price it, and so nobody discovers the boundary after a client has signed.


Beyond the floor

And the rest of the platform

Fuse runs on ERPNext, so sales pipeline, customer service, projects, HR and payroll administration, document control and asset registers are all present on the same site, against the same customers and suppliers Intacct already holds.

Each one is a conversation about where the handover sits — and each one answers to the same rule. Operations happen in Fuse. The accounting consequence goes to Intacct, live, and Intacct decides it.

Configuration

A new client configures itself from Intacct

Item groups come from the product line tree. Decimal precision comes from the item record. Currency comes from the entity. Unit conversions come from Intacct's own UOM detail. Shipped defaults the company does not use are removed.

On a fresh install, nothing is typed by hand beyond the credentials.

Where something is genuinely ambiguous it is reported for a human rather than guessed. A wrong automatic guess is worse than no guess, and a consultant should never have to know which value Fuse chose on their behalf.

Connection

What connecting a company takes

Intacct's XML gateway, not the REST API
A sender ID plus the company's own credentials. No app registration in the Sage developer portal for every customer, and no approval step between a signed deal and a working system.
Nothing on the client's network
No middleware, no proxy, no service to install or babysit, and no third box to blame when something does not post.
One client, one company
One Fuse instance against one Intacct company. The entity is sent on every login, so a multi-entity company posts to the right place without anyone selecting it.
Its own look, or none
The visual layer is a separate, separately released component. A cosmetic change never forces an integration release.
The bad day

Every write is on the record

A full request log
Every write is recorded with the function called, the document behind it, the entity, the duration, the key Intacct returned and the complete request and response. Credentials are stripped before storage, and no role can edit an entry.
A retry cannot double-post stock
Every post carries an identifier derived from the document itself, marked unique. A request that times out after Intacct committed it is rejected as a replay rather than moving stock twice.
Multi-leg movements are all or nothing
A production run is two postings and a transfer is two legs. They go inside a single Intacct transaction, so stock can never leave one place and fail to arrive in another.
A cancellation reverses in Intacct
Undoing a posted movement writes a reversing pair into Intacct, dated to the original posting date so the two net to zero in the period they happened in. If that period is closed, Intacct refuses — which is the correct answer, not an obstacle.
In one line

However much of the operation Fuse takes on, the answer to “who does the accounting” never changes.

That is what makes the list above safe to hand to a finance director.