The screens your stores and production people actually use — on a phone or a tablet, at the rack and at the machine. A scan, a quantity, one button, and Intacct knows before they have put the scanner down.
Stock moves where the stock is. A pallet is booked in at the door, components are drawn at the store hatch, a run is confirmed at the machine. None of that happens next to a keyboard.
So it gets written down and keyed in later — by someone who was not there, from handwriting that may or may not be legible, at the end of a shift or the end of a week.
Every hour between the movement and the keystroke is an hour your stock figure is wrong, and a chance for the note to be lost entirely.
The shop-floor screens are built for a phone with a scanner rather than squeezed onto one. Big targets, short flows, nothing on screen that the person holding it does not need.
Scan or find the purchase order at the door, book in what actually arrived, and put it away.
Draw components against a works order at the store hatch, without a requisition slip in between.
Finish production at the machine. Components off, finished goods on, costed as it happens.
Pick against a customer order and relieve the stock as it leaves, not when the paperwork catches up.
Move stock between locations and record it standing in front of the rack it came from.
Work a count on the device rather than on a clipboard that gets typed up afterwards.
This is the point most mobile modules miss. The shop-floor screens are not a separate product that syncs with the real one later — they are the same site, building the same documents, through the same posting code.
No app store, no device management, no rollout. Anything that can open a browser can work the floor.
There is nothing extra to licence and nothing second to support. It is not sold alongside the system; it is the system.
A movement recorded at the machine reaches Intacct exactly as one recorded at a desk does. There is no second implementation to keep in step.
If Intacct refuses the movement it is rolled back, and the person holding the scanner reads Intacct's own reason on the screen in front of them.
The floor is not feeding a system. The floor is the system.
The screens resolve a scan directly, so a barcode lands in the field it belongs in and nobody types a part number they could have scanned. That is the part that makes the difference on a cold morning in a goods-in bay.
Printing the labels themselves — what goes on them, what size, which printer — is setup work during implementation rather than integration work.
Everyone gets their own login rather than a shared password taped to a terminal. Each receipt, issue, pick and production confirmation records who did it and when, and that record cannot be edited afterwards by anyone.
It is also what makes the quality records worth anything: an inspection signed by a named person, on a calibrated instrument, at a known time.
The gap between a movement happening and the system knowing about it goes from days to seconds.
That gap is where wrong stock figures, unexplained variances and bought-what-we-already-had all come from.